This is TeX, WAITS Version 1.1 (preloaded format=cplain 84.8.28)  3 SEP 1984 16:42
**jmctst
(JMCTST.TEX[B2,JMC] (CLTEX.FIX[TEX,CLT]) (BMAC.TEX[B2,JMC]) (BMAC.FIX[B2,JMC]
\sxfam=\fam11
)
\unit=\dimen18

3 [1] [2] [3] 4 [4] 5 [5] 6 [6]
Underfull \hbox (badness 4416) in paragraph at lines 13--24, p.6
[]\tenrm More gen-er-ally, the list $(\teni m[]; [] ; m[]\tenrm )$ is rep-re-sen
ted by the S-expression 

\hbox(7.5+2.5)x397.48499, glue set 3.5359
.\hbox(0.0+0.0)x20.0
.\tenrm M
.\tenrm o
.\tenrm r
.\tenrm e
.etc.


Underfull \hbox (badness 10000) in paragraph at lines 13--24, p.6
\tenrm (\teni m[]:\tenrm (\teni m[]: [] :\tenrm (\teni m[]:[]\tenrm ) []))$. For
 ex-am-ple, $[]$ is rep-re-sented by 

\hbox(7.5+2.5)x397.48499, glue set 5.66866
.\tenrm (
.\teni m
.\hbox(4.51111+0.0)x4.72221, shifted 1.49998
..\sevenrm 1
.\teni :
.\tenrm (
.etc.

[7]
Overfull \hbox (31.53516pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 92--95, p.6
[]\tenrm Actually Lisp al-lows the ab-bre-vi-a-tion $[]+\teni xy\tenrm 3[]$ for 
the for-mer ex-pres-sion. Thus $[]\teni m[]; [] ; m[] >|

\hbox(6.94444+1.94444)x397.48499, glue set - 1.0
.\hbox(0.0+0.0)x20.0
.\tenrm A
.\tenrm c
.\tenrm t
.\tenrm u
.etc.

7 [8] [9] 8 9 [10] [11] 9.5 10 [12] 11 [13] [14] [15]
Output written on JMCTST.DVI[B2,JMC] (15 pages, 49364 bytes).